Legal Opinion
Krier v. Dell Rapids Twp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 2006No. 23669PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Steve Krier (Krier) appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to Dell Rapids Township on his claims of nuisance and inverse condemnation. We affirm.
Facts
[¶2.] In 1980, the Dell Rapids Township (Township) received a section of Highway 115 from the State of South Dakota. The Township named that section “Garfield Avenue.” At issue in this case is the portion of Highway 115, renamed Garfield Avenue, which runs south from Dell Rapids to South Dakota Highway 115.
[¶ 3.] Over the years, Garfield Avenue fell into a state of disrepair. A portion of the road was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Rupert v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Pauley v. SimonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Loesch v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Ondovchik Family Ltd. Partnership v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.