Legal Opinion
Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 23, 2005No. 04-163PublishedCited by 1,145 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
On occasion, a would-be doctrinal rule or test finds its way into our case law through simple repetition of a phrase— however fortuitously coined. A quarter century ago, in Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U. S. 255 (1980), the Court declared that government regulation of private property “effects a taking if [such regulation] does not substantially advance legitimate state interests____” Id., at 260. Through reiteration in a half dozen or so decisions since Agins, this *532language has been ensconced in our Fifth Amendment takings jurisprudence. See Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,145 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Cedar Point Nursery v. HassidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
1,140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.