Legal Opinion

Pauley v. Simonson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2006No. 23791PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Ezra Pauley and Elizabeth J. Pauley (Pauley) leased agricultural property to Mark J. Simonson and Mira M. Si-monson (Simonson). The lease included an option to purchase the property. When Simonson failed to make a lease payment, Pauley filed an action for forcible entry and detainer. After the circuit court determined that the disputed payment was required and that the lease was breached and terminated, both parties moved for summary judgment to determine whether the option to purchase survived. The circuit court concluded that the option to purchase was not severable,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mattson v. RachettoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jensen v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Krier v. Dell Rapids Twp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of Midnight Star Enterprises, L.P.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lillibridge v. Meade School District 46-1South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kling v. SternSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Detmers v. CostnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hoglund v. Dakota Fire Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API