Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided June 7, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOTION FOR OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff, Buergofol GmbH, alleges that defendant, Omega Liner Company, Inc., is infringing two of its patents. Docket 1. Omega moves for a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1). Dockets 35, 37-1. Buergofol opposes Omega’s proposed protective order, and requests that the court enter Buergofol’s proposed protective order. Docket 49 at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Miscellaneous Docket 1 v. Miscellaneous Docket 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.