Legal Opinion
Philips v. Iguzzini Lighting USA, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 22, 2015No. 15cv3979PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Plaintiff Koninklijke Philips N.V. (“Philips”) and Defendants iGuzzini Lighting USA, Ltd., iGuzzini Lighting North America, Inc., and iGuzzini Illuminazione S.P.A. (“iGuzzini”) raise two issues regarding a proposed protective order: (1) whether Philips’ in-House attorneys should have access to “attorneys’ eyes only” material; and (2) whether a patent prosecution bar should cover claim amendments in certain post-grant proceedings before the Patent & Trademark Office. For the reasons that follow, Philips’ proposal for in-house counsel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Manildra Milling Corp. v. Ogilvie Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Intel Corp. v. Via Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Amerlux, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Chicago Tribune Company, LLC v. Perplexity AI, Inc.; The New York Times Company, Wirecutter, Inc., and The Athletic Media Company v. Perplexity AI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. Perplexity AI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Inc. v. Perplexity AI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Federal Trade Commission v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.