EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. AT & T Mobility LLC
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SILVIA CARREÑO-COLL, United States Magistrate Judge. •
The parties in this case, unable to agree on a joint protective order, filed competing proposals. See Docket Nos. 118, 119. Defendants’ proposal included a patent prosecution bar, see Docket No. 119; Plaintiffs did not, see Docket No. 118. Finding the record insufficient to determine whether such a bar was appropriate, we entered an interim protective order without a prosecution bar and called for additional briefing. See Docket No. 142. After reviewing the *255parties’ filings, see Docket Nos. 150, 155, 159-2, we find that a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Xerox Corp. v. Google, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Nexedge, LLC v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Chiesi USA, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
- Carlson Pet Products, Inc. v. North States Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- DeCurtis LLC v. Carnival CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.