Legal Opinion

Lowery v. Finance America Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 19, 1977No. 7621DC584PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiffs assign error to the court’s holding that “the June 8, 1973, transaction is a subsequent advance under a prior agreement to extend credit and is not subject to” the disclosure requirements of the Act. They contend that the December 1972 and June 1973 loans were separate transactions, and that both were subject to the disclosure requirements of the Act and Regulation Z. Plaintiffs’ position is that the court erred in refusing to award them the statutory penalty and reasonable attorney’s fee. According to plaintiffs, the disclosures were insufficient in each transaction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  2. Mildred Ives v. W. T. Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Steve Tinsman and Nancy Tinsman v. Moline Beneficial Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Powers v. Sims and Levin RealtorsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
  5. Woods v. Beneficial Finance Co. of EugeneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Addison v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Dalton v. Bob Neill Pontiac, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979
  3. Household Consumer Discount Co. v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Equity Plus Consumer Finance & Mortgage Co. v. HowesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. EQUITY PLUS CONSUMER FINANCE v. HowesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API