Legal Opinion
Steve Tinsman and Nancy Tinsman v. Moline Beneficial Finance Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 23, 1976No. 75--1764PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TONE, Circuit Judge.
The question we decide on this appeal is whether the description of the security interest in a consumer loan agreement complies with the Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226 et seq., promulgated under that statute. The District Court held that it did not, and we affirm.
To obtain funds for the purchase of furniture, plaintiffs entered into a written loan agreement with the defendant finance company. Two months later they filed suit alleging that the loan agreement violated the Act and regulation in improperly describing the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Dorothy Allen v. Beneficial Finance Company of Gary, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Johnson v. Associates Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Richard L. Smith and Deborah L. Smith v. No. 2 Galesburg Crown Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Olga Valencia and Miguel Gonzalez v. Anderson Bros. Ford and Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- James A. Rudisell v. The Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Basham v. Finance America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.