Legal Opinion
Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1971No. 69 Civ. 4195PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKEL, District Judge.
The central question in this case is whether defendant Bank violated the disclosure requirements of the Truth in Lending Act when it failed to show the “nominal annual percentage rate” of interest on a statement to plaintiff obligor under an “open end consumer credit plan,” where the statement showed an outstanding balance but no finance charge yet incurred so that no interest rate had yet been applied. (This involved statement of the question and its terms of art should become intelligible as we proceed.) Other questions now before the court are (1) whether,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Mildred Ives v. W. T. Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Betty Eby, a Widow v. Reb Realty, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, and Don Dailey Realty, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Luther Haynes and Lenita Haynes v. Logan Furniture Mart, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.