Legal Opinion
Woods v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Eugene
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 14, 1975No. Civ. 74-39PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SKOPIL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Verla R. Woods, seeks relief for inadequate credit disclosures made in violation of the Federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. (“The Act”) and Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. 226, promulgated thereunder.
Jurisdiction is conferred by 15 U.S.C. § 1640(e).
On January 19, 1973, plaintiff entered into a consumer credit transaction with defendant, Beneficial Finance Co. of Eugene (“Beneficial”). She was comaker of a loan for $1,500. Interest on the loan over a three-year payment period totaled $556.32. The annual percentage rate by Beneficial’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Donald L. Bone v. Hibernia Bank and Michael ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Johnson v. Associates Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1974
- Kenney v. Landis Financial Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- James A. Rudisell v. The Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Steve Tinsman and Nancy Tinsman v. Moline Beneficial Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Garza v. Allied Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- John C. Pollock v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- James L. Martin v. Commercial Securities Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.