Legal Opinion

Household Consumer Discount Co. v. Payne

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1978No. 8850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a ruling of the Akron Municipal Court denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Facts

The defendants, Robert and Ora Payne, defaulted on a promissory note held by the plaintiff, Household Consumer Discount. The plaintiff sued on the note. Alleging that the note violated the Truth in Lending Act, Section 1601 et seq., Title 15, U.S. Code (1968), the defendants counterclaimed for the statutory damages authorized in Section 1640, Title 15, U.S. Code. Specifically, defendants alleged that the disclosure of default charges did not comply with 12 C.F.R.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. GAC Finance Corp. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  2. Lowery v. Finance America Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Misher v. Household Finance Consumer Discount Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API