Clopton v. Clopton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County refusing a new trial. Z. B. West, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from an order denying their motion for a new trial in an action brought by plaintiff to obtain a decree requiring defendant Hoggatt Clopton, her husband, to pay her monthly, for her support and maintenance, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars per month, together with attorney fees and costs for the prosecution of the action.
Plaintiff alleged in her complaint that she was without means and physically unable to earn money for her support. Defendants Pearl Clopton and Hugh Clopton, the children of Hoggatt Clopton, were made parties defendant, it being alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Robinson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Tully v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- French v. McAnarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Monogram Industries, Inc. v. Sar Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Marks v. ReissingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- In Re Marriage of HiggasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.