Legal Opinion

Sweat v. Hollister

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1995No. D018807PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FROEHLICH, J.

This appeal is brought by the plaintiffs from a summary judgment in favor of all defendants. Plaintiffs, purchasers of a residence in the City of Poway, sued defendant sellers as well as the sellers’ real estate representatives. The trial court ruled that no triable issues of fact existed as to certain crucial issues upon which the plaintiffs’ complaint depended, that as a matter of law the facts adjudicated did not support a cause of action, and hence granted judgment for the defendants. The court also awarded costs and substantial attorney fees to all defendants.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API