Legal Opinion
Ensher, Alexander & Barsoom, Inc. v. Ensher
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1964No. Civ. 10753PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, Acting P. J.
This is appellant’s second appeal from an adverse judgment in an action to declare respondent to be the resulting or constructive trustee of certain real property, commonly known as “Elkhorn Ranch,” for the sole use and benefit of appellant. We reversed the judgment for respondent on the first appeal because the trial court failed to find on material issues. (Ensher, Alexander & Barsoom, Inc. v. Ensher, 210 Cal.App.2d 184 [26 Cal.Rptr. 381].) That judgment was “reversed with directions to the trial court to make findings on the issues raised by the pleadings ... and thereafter to render…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Shakin v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Mediterranean Constr. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Cedar Rapids Steel Transportation, Inc. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.