Legal Opinion

Granberry v. Islay Investments

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1995No. S035591PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

An important provision of our statutory landlord-tenant law provides that within three weeks after the termination of tenancy a landlord must return the security deposit paid by a former tenant and provide a written accounting of any portion retained as compensation for unpaid rent, repairs, and cleaning. (Civ. Code, § 1950.5, subd. (f).)1 We granted review to determine whether a landlord who in good faith fails to comply with the requirements of this statute may nevertheless recover damages for unpaid rent, repairs, and cleaning in a subsequent judicial proceeding. We also…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API