Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
The trial court certified this case as a nationwide class action without determining the force and effect of contractual agreements that, according to the defendant, would require the application of different states’ laws in the action. The Court of Appeal found certification was proper because the defendant had failed to show that the contractually selected laws would lead to different results. We conclude the certification order must be vacated, for it was based upon an incomplete and erroneous analysis of factors relevant to certification.
Factual and Procedural Background
Am…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by338 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.