Venable v. Harmon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs-sellers in an action with reference to a contract for the purchase and sale of real property.
The facts are stipulated in writing by the parties. 1
On September 7, 1961, plaintiffs filed a complaint for breach of contract seeking as damages the monthly payments past due and to become due up to the time of trial. The defendants based their defense solely upon section 580b of the Code of Civil Procedure. The cause was tried and the court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law, the significant portion of which state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Bargioni v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Heckes v. SappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rex v. Chase Home Finance LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re: Prestige Limited Partnership ConcordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kish v. Bay Counties Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.