Legal Opinion

Bargioni v. Hill

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1963No. S. F. 21225PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant purchased a motel and executed a $5,000 note to plaintiff, who had acted as broker in the transaction. The note was secured by a junior trust deed on the motel. Defendant defaulted on the note and plaintiff sued for the balance due, the security having been lost through a private sale under a senior trust deed.- The trial court entered judgment for the amount due. Defendant appeals.

Defendant contends that plaintiff’s recovery is barred by section 580d of the Code of Civil Procedure. ' That section, however, bars recovery only on a note secured by a trust deed or mortgage that has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Peterson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Childers v. Parker's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API