Legal Opinion

Heckes v. Sapp

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1964No. Civ. 10756PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Apellants appeal from a judgment entered against them in an action they brought against respondents as guarantors of a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on real property executed by Jonathan Manor, Inc., to appellants. The parties submitted the case to the trial court on a partial stipulation of facts. The stipulation was designated partial because attorneys’ fees provided for in the promissory note were not stipulated to. Evidence was presented as to the fees of appellants’ attorneys.

A summary of the evidence included in the partial stipulation of facts is as follows: Jonathan…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bargioni v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  2. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API