Legal Opinion
Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash Partners
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 28, 2000No. 99-15673PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Prestige Limited Partnership (“Prestige”) appeals the district court’s order affirming an order of the bankruptcy court. We conclude that the unsecured claim held by East Bay Car Wash Partners (“East Bay”) agaitfst Prestige’s bankruptcy estate is not barred by Cal. Civ. Proc.Code § 580b nor by East Bay’s violation of Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 726. We therefore affirm the district court order.
Background
In 1990, Prestige purchased a car wash business from East Bay, financed in part by a seller carry-back loan of $1,573,000. Prestige gave East Bay a promissory note (“first…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Security Pacific National Bank v. WozabCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Evalyn PREBLICH, Appellant, v. Kenneth BATTLEY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC v. Montano (In Re Montano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- In re: Steven Patrick Schlegel Joanne Marie SchlegelUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In Re: Prestige Limited Partnership ConcordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Captain Blythers, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Blecher v. LoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.