Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Relator Leadro Seemann seeks review of a determination that disqualified him from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits because he engaged in gross misconduct. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
Leadro Seemann began working as general manager of the respondent Little Crow Trucking in July 1983. One of his responsibilities was to obtain an ICC license for Little Crow. He was discharged on February 28, 1986 for several reasons, including a claim that he had used Little Crow’s funds to obtain another, separate ICC trucking license for himself and a co-worker, under the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Ottenheimer Publishers, Inc. v. Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Schulte v. Transportation Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ginsberg v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988