Legal Opinion

Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 1987No. C9-87-800PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Relator Leadro Seemann seeks review of a determination that disqualified him from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits because he engaged in gross misconduct. We affirm as modified.

FACTS

Leadro Seemann began working as general manager of the respondent Little Crow Trucking in July 1983. One of his responsibilities was to obtain an ICC license for Little Crow. He was discharged on February 28, 1986 for several reasons, including a claim that he had used Little Crow’s funds to obtain another, separate ICC trucking license for himself and a co-worker, under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Ottenheimer Publishers, Inc. v. Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Schulte v. Transportation Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API