Legal Opinion

Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1984No. C9-84-328PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Cary applied for unemployment benefits. A department claims deputy denied benefits because Cary had voluntarily quit without good cause attributable to the employer. On appeal, the appeal referee reversed and allowed benefits. The commissioner’s representative, however, reversed the referee’s decision. We affirm.

FACTS

Donald Cary, the relator, was a salesperson for Custom Coach, Inc. of Hopkins, Minnesota.- Cary’s wages were based on a 25% commission on the profit from any sale he made. He received a draw on the commission. While Cary claimed that the draw was $1,000 per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Group Health Plan, Inc. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Winkler v. Park Refuse Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. LaSalle Cartage Co., Inc. v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Youa True Vang v. A-1 Maintenance ServiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Portz v. Pipestone SkelgasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Norman v. Rosemount, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API