Legal Opinion
Ginsberg v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 18, 1992No. C8-91-1540PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Richard Ginsberg, formerly an Assistant to the Commissioner and Economic Opportunity Director in the Department of Jobs and Training, sought and was denied unemployment benefits. The Commissioner of Jobs and Training, in denying Ginsberg’s claim, reasoned that he was ineligible for benefits because he had not been “employed” by the Department of Jobs and Training; rather, he had worked in a “major nontenured policymaking or advisory position in the unclassified service.” We affirm.
FACTS
Richard Ginsberg began working for the Department of Jobs and Training in March 1988.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- McGraw v. Marion County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Chanhassen Chiropractic Center, P.A. v. City of ChanhassenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- A-Plus Demonstrations, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Lang v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.