Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
We granted the state’s petition for review in order to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the revocation of the license of Paul Eugene Appel-gate for failing an implied consent test. The main issue relates to the circumstances under which police may make a limited investigative stop of a person in the area of a recently committed crime. The trial court, rejecting the recommendation of a referee, ruled that the stop was valid. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, ruling that the stop was invalid. Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public Safety,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. JuarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- State v. L'ITALIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. KoppiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Fargo v. OvindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.