Legal Opinion
San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians v. State of California CA2/8
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 5, 2015No. B254870UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.
Plaintiff and appellant San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians (San Pasqual) appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants and respondents State of California and the California Gambling Control Commission (the State). In September 1999, San Pasqual and the State entered into a written contract (the Compact) governing San Pasqual’s operation of a casino on its land in San Diego County. San Pasqual contends the Compact authorized it to operate up to a maximum of 2,000 slot machines at its casino, but the State wrongfully refused for several years to issue it…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klein v. Safyari CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Microsoft Corporation v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Terry v. Wasatch Advantage Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024