Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Appellant Daniel Jennings developed a subcutaneous abdominal infection following a surgical procedure. Jennings filed a medical malpractice action against defendants Palomar Pomerado Hospital, Inc. (Palomar) and Doctors Fred Hammill and Paul Polishuk (together defendants) in which he claimed a cause of the infection was that defendants negligently left a ribbon retractor (the retractor) in his abdominal cavity after the surgery. The trial court struck the testimony of Dr. Miller, the expert on whom Jennings relied to show the retention of the retractor in his abdomen…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Viner v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Jones v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. PruntyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Powell v. KleinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bushling v. Fremont Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.