Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Key Bank of Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1993No. S-4499PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
The principal issue we address in this appeal is whether Richard Wagner (Wagner) gained individual contract rights under the terms of a 1989 settlement agreement with Key Bank of Alaska (Key Bank). The parties entered into the settlement after Wagner filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and was appointed as “debtor-in-possession” of the bankruptcy estate by the bankruptcy judge in charge of the case. The settlement was intended to resolve disputes and facilitate the sale of certain bankruptcy estate properties which partially secured Wagner’s indebtedness to Key Bank.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Harold M. Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- In the Matter of Met-L-Wood Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Constantine John Gekas, Trustee. Constantine John Gekas, Trustee v. Frederick L. PipinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- In RE v. Savino Oil & Heating Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- In Re Lucio F. RUSSO, Bankrupt. Avery J. GROSS, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Tina RUSSO, Appellee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Munn v. ThorntonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Powell v. Washington Land Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Williams v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.