Legal Opinion

Rockstad v. Erikson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2005No. S-10464PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury found Ronald Rockstad liable for failing to repay a loan from Gerald Erikson that was secured by a note and deed of trust on Rockstad’s home. The superior court awarded Erikson the unpaid sum, including the substantial interest that had accumulated on it, as well as costs and fees. Rockstad claims that the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment to Erikson on Rock-stad’s statute of limitations defense. Because Rockstad’s trial admissions render any error associated with the grant of summary judgment harmless, we do not reach his claim…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Richard Gonzales, Juliana Gonzales and Michael Dodge v. Barbara Parks and Jerome ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Shiner v. MoriartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Carlson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Interior Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant & Retailers Ass'n v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kelly v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API