Munn v. Thornton
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Jonathan Thornton, a general contractor, entered into an oral contract to build a house for Steve and Jeannie Munn. Thornton maintains that he agreed to build the house for the cost of time and materials plus 15 percent with no cap on the total cost. The Munns contend that their agreement included a cap on total cost for the house. The cost escalated above this alleged cap, and the Munns refused to pay the outstanding balance. Thornton filed a complaint against the Munns. After a trial, the superior court ruled in Thornton’s favor, finding that he was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Wren v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Evans v. EvansAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Chilkoot Lumber Co. v. Rainbow Glacier Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.