Legal Opinion

Williams v. Baker

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2019No. Supreme Court No. S-16951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLGER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court found Deverette and Johnny Williams liable for defrauding Johnny's employer, Violeta Baker, after concluding that both owed her fiduciary duties and therefore had the burden of persuasion to show the absence of fraud. The court totaled fraud damages at nearly five million dollars and trebled this amount under Alaska's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (UTPA). After final judgment was entered against Deverette and Johnny, Johnny died. Deverette now appeals her liability for the fraud. We affirm Deverette's liability for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Maines v. Kenworth Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Offshore Systems-Kenai v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Richard R. Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of Erna RouseyAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Kambic v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Alaska · 2020
  5. Mark Daum v. Kimberly DaumAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API