Legal Opinion

Seybert v. Cominco Alaska Exploration

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2008No. S-12085, S-12115PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Kenneth Seybert injured his neck while he was working as a millwright for Cominco Alaska at the Red Dog Mine in 1992. He had two surgeries and, after a physician determined he was medically stable, was evaluated for reemployment benefits. In January 1995 Seybert and Cominco executed a Compromise and Release (C & R) to settle Sey-bert's workers' compensation claim. Seybert was not represented by counsel. The C & R identified two disputes: (1) whether Seybert could change physicians, and (2) whether the reemployment plan developed for Cominco was…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re the Adoption of S.K.L.H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API