Legal Opinion
Bogart v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 24, 1973PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
The plaintiff, Ruth Bogart, 1 instituted this action against the three defendants, Mrs. Janet Tucker, William Vincent and John T. Pariseau, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. The jury returned a verdict against all the defendants and judgment was rendered on the verdict which the court refused to set aside. The defendants have appealed. 2
The amended complaint alleged that on or about September 18,1965, the plaintiff, owner and operator of an automobile, was proceeding westerly along a public highway in the town of Branford; that Pariseau,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Kalleher v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Felsted v. Kimberly Auto Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Vetre v. KeeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Anderson v. NedovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.