Legal Opinion
Grievance Committee v. Dacey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 19, 1966PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
This action was brought by the Grievance Committee of the Bar of Fairfield County seeking an injunction to restrain the defendants from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in violation of General Statutes § 51-88.
The defendants’ attempts to secure additions to the finding are largely without merit. Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co., 145 Conn. 290, 293, 141 A.2d 634. The same may be said of most of their attempts to secure deletions from the finding. With two exceptions, hereinafter discussed, the few changes to which the defendants have shown themselves entitled will be…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Katz v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.