Legal Opinion
Dreier v. Upjohn Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 14, 1985No. 11529PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
In this medical malpractice action, a verdict was returned and judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, Vincent Pepe, M.D. The plaintiff claims that the judgment should be vacated because the *243trial court erred in allowing the defendant to introduce as admissions portions of a superseded pleading containing allegations against the named defendant, the Upjohn Company, and in failing to declare a mistrial based on the plaintiffs charge of witness tampering by the defendant. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
From the evidence the jury could have reasonably found the following…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Kanopka v. KanopkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.