Lewis Ex Rel. Quinn v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Leonard Quinn was denied full-time employment at Ford Motor Company because his medical history disclosed an asthmatic condition in his early youth. Quinn filed a discrimination complaint. The trial court granted summary judgment for Ford Motor based on a state statute affording a defense to the discrimination and the medical report of Ford Motor’s examining physician, stating that employment of Quinn at Ford Motor could adversely affect his health. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Quinn was employed by Ford Motor Company on January 26, 1977, as a part-time employee. At…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Power v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- G.E.M. of St. Louis, Inc. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lewis v. Remmele Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. EidahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Bourbon Bar & Cafe Corp. v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- County of Winona v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.