Legal Opinion

State v. Eidahl

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1993No. 17986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

State appeals an order dismissing an information charging Catherine Eidahl (Ei-dahl) with one count of driving or control of a vehicle while having 0.10 percent or more of alcohol in her blood (DUI). We affirm.

FACTS

This case is once again before us after our remand in State v. Eidahl, 486 N.W.2d 257 (S.D.1992). The pertinent facts have not changed. At approximately 2:45 a.m. *92on May 12, 1991, a police officer for the City of Huron, South Dakota, was on duty in a patrol car parked on a city street. The officer saw Eidahl’s car pass by and, for no reason other than the late…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SaizSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sommervold v. GrevlosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. MullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. CraigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. WEST TWO RIVERS RANCH v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Sommervold v. GrevlosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API