Legal Opinion

G.E.M. of St. Louis, Inc. v. City of Bloomington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1966No. 39745, 39760PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeals from a judgment of the district court entered pursuant to an order made in response to a motion for summary judgment in proceedings instituted by G.E.M. of St. Louis, Inc., against the city of Bloomington in an effort to establish the invalidity of an ordinance adopted by the city prohibiting certain business activities on Sunday.

The ordinance involved-reads as follows:

“Section 1. Definition and Interpretation.
“A. Definition.
“ ‘Person’ as used in this ordinance means a partnership, corporation, association, or any other group however organized and any individual,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Target Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Lewis Ex Rel. Quinn v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Anderson v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Graco, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Research Action ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API