Legal Opinion
Olson v. City of Sioux Falls
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1935No. File No. 7792PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover damages for the depreciation in value of their land caused by reason of the alleged pollution of the Big Sioux river by defendant city. The .action was tried at the September term of the circuit court in the year 1934, and resulted in a disagreement of the jury. Plaintiffs then moved for a change of the place of trial claiming that a fair and impartial trial could not be had in Minnehaha county; that the adverse interest of the inhabitants of the city of Sioux Falls in the question involved prevented the selection of an unbiased jury in that county…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Sheridan County v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Irwin v. TaubmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Alderman v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Territory of Dakota ex rel. Travelers' Ins. v. Judge of the District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Breck v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Krsnak v. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.