Legal Opinion
Bland v. Davison County
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice (on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] In Bland v. Davison County, 507 N.W.2d 80 (S.D.1993) we rejected the contention that Davison County, in the maintenance of icy roads, had absolute discretion and held rather that it was charged with the duty of “reasonable and ordinary care.” Upon retrial, the jury found that the County fulfilled this obligation and decided in favor of the County. Arpie Bland appeals this adverse jury verdict in her personal injury lawsuit against the County. She claims 1) that the trial court erred when it refused to grant a change of venue in light of pretrial…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Douglas D. Webb v. Lawrence County, South Dakota Charles Crotty, in His Individual Capacity and Official Capacity as Lawrence County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Roth v. Farner-Bocken Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- First Premier Bank v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Luther v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.