Legal Opinion

Cook v. Pendergast

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1882No. 7,752PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Appeal from an order denying defendant a change of place of trial in the Superior Court of the County of Colusa. Hatch, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court :

The defendant moved for a change of venue on the ground that the action was not brought in the proper county, by reason of non-residence of the defendant. The plaintiff resisted the motion on the ground of. convenience of witnesses. The Court below denied the motion, and defendant appealed. The appeal was heard in this Court by Department One, and its opinion was filed January 9, 1882. (8 Pac. L. J., 1,006.)

Subsequently, a hearing by the Court in bank was gianted. Such hearing has been had.

We are satisfied with the views expressed in the opinion of the Department; therefore, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. California Stage Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Loehr v. LathamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Hanchett v. FinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Pierson v. McCahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Tooms v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Thomas v. Placerville Gold Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API