Legal Opinion

Alderman v. New York Underwriters Insurance

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1933No. File Nos. 7248, 7258PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P. J.

Two actions have been consolidated, tried, and briefed on appeal as one. Separate findings and judgments^ were entered in each action. Two policies of insurance against fire, one covering the fixtures and the other covering a building located in Gregory county, were issued by appellants. A fire occurred and the building and fixtures were partially destroyed on the 9th day of September, 1928. 'On July 9, 1929, the plaintiff commenced these separate actions against the defendants and1 appellants by serving a summons and complaint on the commissioner of insurance, and laid -the venue of such…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Gans v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hollis v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Cannon v. Home Insurance Company of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. KittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Hansen Housing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moulton v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Olson v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bruins v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ziegler v. RyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API