Breck v. Janklow
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Betty E. Breck appeals a judgment dismissing various claims challenging the sale of the South Dakota State Cement Plant. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Since the early 1920s, the State of South Dakota has owned and operated its own cement plant in the Rapid City, South Dakota area. The State’s ownership of a normally private commercial enterprise can be attributed to the lack of an in-state cement producer in the early-1900s and the monopolistic prices being charged for the product during the post-World War I era of heavy infrastructure development. See Reeves, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Reeves, Inc. v. StakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Doe v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Brendtro v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Long v. State of S.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Davis v. Ssd Dept. of Ed.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.