Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel H. Overmyer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1989No. 87-3488PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HACKETT, District Judge.

The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, granting defendant’s motion for acquittal under F.R.Crim. P. 29(c). Appellant contends that when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government, a reasonable jury could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. After a thorough review of the voluminous record in this case, we find that the jury had sufficient evidence to sustain its verdict. We therefore reverse the judgment of the district court and reinstate the jury’s verdict.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Buenaventura Martinez, Juan Martinez, Jaime B. Salcedo, United States of America v. Manuel Suarez-O'neillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. John F. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel H. OvermyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. County of El Paso v. Dorado, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
  3. Barr v. Overmyer (In Re Overmyer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. In re AnthonyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
  5. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API