Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Naegele

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 18, 2007No. Criminal 05-0151 (PLF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss Count 7 of the indictment. 1 Upon careful consideration of the legal arguments presented by counsel and the record in this case, the Court will grant the motion and dismiss Count 7 of the indictment.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant Timothy Naegele is an attorney licensed to practice law in California and in the District of Columbia. Naegele owns his own law firm as a sole proprietorship. On or about March 29, 2000, Nae-gele filed a Chapter 7 petition for personal bankruptcy in the United States…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. United States v. Sabri YakouCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. James A. ConlonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. John G. GelleneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kopff v. World Research Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2016
  4. United States v. HitselbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Aboud and Aboud PC v. CaryDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API