Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 15, 1994No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 30, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

On August 5, 1993, Joseph Emannuel Williams (“Respondent”), a member of the Maryland Bar since 1985, was charged by the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, with multiple counts of professional misconduct as defined by Rule BV1 k and Rule 1230 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure. The petition alleged that Respondent had violated Rules 1.1, 1.3, 1.4,1.15, 3.3 and 8.4 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. 1 The petition also alleged that Respondent violated Maryland Code (1989), § 10-306 of the Business Occupations and Professions Article and Rule…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API