Karrell v. Watson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The questions for decision are (1) whether the evidence before the administrative officer justified the revocation of respondent’s license as a real estate broker and (2) whether the three-year statute of limitations began to run when the real estate commissioner discovered evidence of her crimes or at the time of her final conviction therefor.
During 1946 respondent was a licensed real estate broker operating under a variety of fictitious names. A part of her business consisted of selling lots to veterans. The parcels were evaluated by appraisers selected by the Administrator of Veterans…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brecheen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Riley v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re RiccardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Manning v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Archer v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Furnish v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- American Motorists Insurance v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.