Legal Opinion
Manning v. Watson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1952No. Civ. 14851PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is an appeal by the Real Estate Commissioner from a judgment granting respondent Manning a peremptory writ of mandate ordering said commissioner to annul his decision and order of suspension of respondent’s license as a real estate broker for a 30-day period and annulling the proposed decision of the hearing officer adopted in said order of the commissioner.
Insofar as here relevant, the accusation which opened the disciplinary action charged respondent with violation of sections 10176 subdivision (i) and 10177 subdivision (f) of the Business and Professions Code, in that on or about May…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Burbank v. McIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Risdon v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Rowe v. SuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Arenstein v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Black v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Golde v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Small v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.