In Re Riccardi
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING for disbarment of an attorney at law. Action deferred pending appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
—The disbarment of the attorney is sought in this matter upon production of a certified copy of the record of conviction of the attorney in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco of a felony involving moral turpitude. (Code Civ. Proe., secs. 287-289.). -It is conceded in the learned and exhaustive brief filed by the president of the San Francisco Bar Association that an appeal from such- judgment of conviction is pending in the district court of appeal of the first appellate district. The judgment of conviction, therefore, has not become final. We have, then, precisely the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McKannay v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Helena Rubenstein Internat. v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Truchon v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.