Legal Opinion

Brecheen v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1921No. S. F. No. 9782PublishedCited by 44 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Review. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.

This is an application for the issuance of a writ of review. The petition alleges that at all the times in it mentioned petitioner was a licensed real estate broker, doing business in the county of Alameda, -this state; that he was duly served with a complaint filed in a proceeding before the real estate commissioner of the state of California asking the revocation of his license theretofore issued to him as such broker pursuant to the provisions of an act commonly known as the “Real Estate Act” (Stats. 1919, p. 1252); that petitioner answered such complaint denying in effect the allegations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. County of Los Angeles v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API