Archer v. Harvey
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. The appeal is taken on the judgment-roll alone.
The complaint alleges that on November 21, 1898, Hannah S. Skinner, the predecessor in interest of the defendants, entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff, Archer. By the terms of the writing, which is set forth at length in the complaint, Mrs. Skinner, in consideration of services performed for her by Archer as attorney and counsel in a cause entitled B. W. Cave et al. v. George W. Tyler et al., and of further services to be performed “in appealing said cause to the supreme…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Chever v. Ching Hong PoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Church v. QuinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Rockey v. VieuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Tooley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Farmers & Merchants Trust Co. v. MadeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.